Hands use a calculator while reviewing financial documents.

Telehealth · Reimbursement

Who pays for virtual care?

Telehealth reimbursement is a moving target — split across Medicare, Medicaid, and private payers, each with its own rules for what's covered and at what rate. Understanding coverage versus parity is where every reimbursement strategy begins.

The Landscape

Three payers, three rulebooks

Federal

Medicare

CMS sets telehealth payment through the annual Physician Fee Schedule, while Congress controls the bigger levers — geographic and originating-site restrictions. Recent cycles expanded the services list, extended flexibilities, and added audio-only and virtual-supervision options.

Physician Fee Schedule Services list Audio-only Virtual supervision
Federal & State

Medicaid

Jointly funded but largely state-designed within federal standards of efficiency, economy, and quality. Because each state sets its own rules, every Medicaid program covers telehealth differently.

Whether to cover What types Where Which providers How much
Commercial

Private payers

No federal law governs private telehealth coverage, but at least 39 states and D.C. have reimbursement or parity laws — ranging from simply requiring coverage to mandating equal payment.

39 states + D.C. Coverage laws Parity laws

Know the Difference

Coverage parity vs. payment parity

The single most important distinction in telehealth reimbursement — and the one that decides what actually gets paid:

Coverage Parity

Requires payers to cover a service delivered via telehealth if it's also covered in person and can be delivered remotely while meeting the standard of care.

Payment Parity

Goes further — requiring payers to reimburse telehealth at the same rate as the equivalent in-person service. Far fewer states require it.

Where It's Heading

The policy is still moving

CMS continues to refine telehealth payment through the Physician Fee Schedule. The CY2026 final rule locked in a more permanent telehealth framework, Congress extended the statutory flexibilities through December 31, 2027, and the CY2027 proposed rule (July 2026) keeps the framework moving.

  • A permanent services list — the 'provisional' vs. 'permanent' split is retired, so listed codes stay.
  • Fewer frequency limits — caps on subsequent inpatient, nursing-facility, and critical-care telehealth visits removed.
  • Modernized supervision — 'immediate availability' of a supervising practitioner via real-time audio/video now qualifies.
  • New RPM and RTM codes — finalized for services with as few as 2–15 days of data collection, payable from 2026.
  • AI and SaaS costs — still open: CMS continues exploring how to reflect AI- and software-enabled service costs in the CY2027 cycle.

Coding & Access

Codes, categories, and the HDHP cliff

Coding for telehealth is complex and constantly shifting. Billable services generally fall into a few families:

  • Telehealth visit
  • Telephone E/M
  • Remote monitoring
  • Online digital visits

One access gap to watch: the High-Deductible Health Plan telehealth safe harbor — which let HDHPs cover telehealth pre-deductible without jeopardizing HSA eligibility — has expired, raising costs for many patients. Restoring that safe harbor remains a live policy priority.

A clinic receptionist discussing paperwork with a visitor.

The rules change every cycle.

Know what Medicare, Medicaid, and payers will cover.

CTeL members get PFS analysis, 50-state Medicaid data, and coverage-vs-parity intelligence.