Telehealth Fraud
Program integrity in virtual care.
As telehealth and remote monitoring scale, so does federal scrutiny of how they're billed. Staying compliant means understanding where oversight is heading — from outlier-billing detection to OIG enforcement and False Claims Act risk.
Where Oversight Is Heading
The program-integrity landscape
Monitoring for fraud and abuse
Program integrity starts with detection — monitoring systems that flag outlier billing patterns and keep telehealth services compliant with healthcare regulations.
RPM oversight and enforcement
Federal scrutiny of Remote Physiologic Monitoring is intensifying, with new Office of Inspector General (OIG) enforcement priorities, False Claims Act exposure, and rising audit activity affecting both providers and vendors.
PDMP query measures
CMS is strengthening prescription-drug-monitoring safeguards — including moving its PDMP query measure from attestation-based toward performance-based reporting.
Staying Compliant
Build the guardrails now
CTeL's RPM Oversight and Enforcement session outlined the practical steps organizations can take to strengthen compliance programs as oversight activity intensifies in 2026 and beyond.
- Documentation expectations — meet the evidentiary bar auditors now expect for RPM claims.
- Billing compliance — align coding and claims with current RPM requirements.
- Vendor contracting — address enforcement risk in agreements with device and platform vendors.
- Compliance programs — strengthen RPM compliance as OIG audit activity continues.
What the Research Shows
Diversion, reconsidered
Compliance is a moving target.
Stay ahead of the enforcement curve.
CTeL members track OIG priorities, audit trends, and billing-compliance guidance as they emerge.
